vs
Cooked Fat Back vs Lard Calories
Lard has 20% more calories than cooked fat back: 902 vs 750 calories per 100 g.
For protein, cooked fat back has more. For fat, lard has more. For carbohydrates, about the same carbohydrates. For fiber, about the same fiber.
By typical serving, 1 slice of cooked fat back (47 g) has 353 calories and 1 tbsp of lard (12 g) has 108 calories.
Cooked Fat Back and Lard calorie calculator
Nutrition per 100 grams
| Nutrient | Cooked Fat Back | Lard |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 750 | 902 |
| Protein | 2.7 g | 0 g |
| Fat | 82 g | 100 g |
| Saturated fat | 31 g | 39 g |
| Carbohydrates | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sodium | 2039 mg | 0 mg |
| Potassium | 47 mg | 0 mg |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 0 mg |
| Iron | 0.2 mg | 0 mg |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 0 mg |
Cooked Fat Back vs Lard: common questions
Which has more calories, cooked fat back or lard?
Lard has more calories per 100 g (902 vs 750).
Which has more protein, cooked fat back or lard?
Cooked Fat Back has more protein per 100 g (2.7 g vs 0 g).
Is cooked fat back or lard better for weight loss?
Cooked Fat Back has fewer calories per 100 g, so you can eat more of it for the same calories. Total calories across the day matter more than any single food, and protein and fiber help with fullness.
More comparisons
Cooked Fat Back
Source: USDA FoodData Central. Cooked Fat Back: FDC ID 2705892. Lard: FDC ID 2710166.